REDESIGN STRUKTUR ATAS BETON BERTULANG BERDASARKAN SNI 1726:2012 MENGGUNAKAN PETA GEMPA 2017 StudiKasus: GedungKampus III InstitutSains&Teknologi “Akprind” Yogyakarta REDESIGNING STRUCTURE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BASED ON SNI 1726: 2012 USING THE 2017 EARTHQUAKE MAP Case Study: Campus Building III "Akprind" Institute of Science & Technology Yogyakarta

Hendiawan, Adhi Surya and Budianto, Johan (2020) REDESIGN STRUKTUR ATAS BETON BERTULANG BERDASARKAN SNI 1726:2012 MENGGUNAKAN PETA GEMPA 2017 StudiKasus: GedungKampus III InstitutSains&Teknologi “Akprind” Yogyakarta REDESIGNING STRUCTURE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BASED ON SNI 1726: 2012 USING THE 2017 EARTHQUAKE MAP Case Study: Campus Building III "Akprind" Institute of Science & Technology Yogyakarta. Tugas Akhir thesis, University Technology Yogyakarta.

[img]
Preview
Text
5150811274_Adhi Surya Hendiawan.pdf

Download (144kB) | Preview

Abstract

Abstrak GempaBumimenjadifaktor yang sangatpentingdalamevaluasistrukturgedung di Indonesia, karenaposisiwilayah Indonesia terletakpadapertemuan 3 lempengtektonik, yaitulempeng Indo-Australia, Eurasia danPasifik. Disampingitu, wilayah Indonesia jugadilaluioleh 2 jalurgempadunia, yaknijalurgempa Asia danPasifik, akibatnyaseringterjadigempabaikdenganskalakecil, sedangdanbesar. Olehkarenaitu, perencanaanGedungharussesuaidenganperaturandanpersyaratan yang berlaku di Indonesia yaitudengan SNI. MakadariituperencanaanGedungKampusInstitutSains&Teknologi “Akprind” Yogyakarta iniperludidasarkanpadaketahananterhadapgempadenganfaktorkeutamaangempa yang besar. Hal inikarenaGedungKampusmerupakanfasilitaspendidikan yang dapatmenampungbanyak orang, sehinggaharusdirencanakanuntukkokohberdirimeskipunterjadigempa. TujuandaripenelitianiniyaituuntukmengetahuiperbandingangayadalamantaraPetaGempa 2010 danPetaGempa 2017 sertamengetahuihasilanalisisstrukturatasbetonbertulangterhadaptingkatkeamananberdasarkan SNI 1726:2012 danmenggunakanPetaGempa 2017. Padapenelitianinidilakukananalisisdenganmenggunakansoftware SAP2000 v.14 dengancarametodeResponse Spectrume. Berdasarkanhasilanalisis yang telahdilakukanperbedaan Response Spectrume SNI PetaGempa 2010 dengan SNI PetaGempa 2017 adalahpada parameter percepatanresponse spectrumGempa SNI 2010 (Ss = 1,28), (S1 = 0,46), (Sa = 0,85) lebihrendahdaripercepatanresponse spectrumGempa SNI 2017 (Ss = 1,7), (S1 = 0,65), (Sa = 1,13). Dari hasiltersebutdapatdisimpulkanbahwaterjadikenaikandariPetaGempa 2010 denganPetaGempa 2017, UntukSsterjadipeningkatan 24%. Untuk S1 terjadipeningkatan 29% danuntukpercepatanpuncakSaterjadipeningkatan 24%. Kemudianuntukhasilanalisisstruktur portal Plat, balokdankolom, didapatkanhasilanalisisgayadalam yang berbeda. Perbedaan tersebut terjadikarenabebangempa yang dihasilkanpada tiap peta gempa berbeda dalam penentuan respon spektral percepatan gempa dipermukaan tanah mengacu pada parameter percepatan batuan, faktor amplikasi terkait getaran periode pendek (Fa) pada periode 0,2 detik dan periode 1 detik sehingga gaya dalam portal Plat, balok dan kolom yang dihasilkan mengalami peningkatan rata rata gaya geser (BMD) 2,0728% dan momen (BMD) 0,5857% pada Plat dan peningkatan rata rata gaya geser (SFD) 1,7437% dan momen (BMD) 4,34% pada balok dan peningkatan rata rata gaya geser (SFD) 15,1061% dan momen (BMD) 26,44% pada kolom. Kata kunci:,GedungKampus, PetaGempa, Response Spectrume, SNI 2010, SNI 2017 Abstract The earthquake became a very important factor in the evaluation of the structure of buildings in Indonesia, because the position of the Indonesian territory lies at the confluence of 3 tectonic plates, namely the Indo-Australian, Eurasian and Pacific plates. In addition, the territory of Indonesia is also traversed by 2 world earthquake pathways, namely the Asia and Pacific earthquake lane, consequently frequent earthquakes occur on a small, medium and large scale. Therefore, building planning must be in accordance with regulations and requirements in Indonesia, namely SNI. Therefore the planning of the Yogyakarta Akprind "Science & Technology" Campus Building Yogyakarta needs to be based on earthquake resistance with a major earthquake factor. This is because the Campus Building is an educational facility that can accommodate many people, so it must be planned to stand firm in the event of an earthquake. The purpose of this research is to know the comparison of inner forces between the 2010 Earthquake Map and the 2017 Earthquake Map as well as knowing the results of the structure analysis of reinforced concrete against the level of security based on SNI 1726: 2012 and using the 2017 Earthquake Map. In this study the analysis was carried out using SAP2000 v.14 software with Response Spectrum method. The results of the analysis show the difference between the Response Spectrum of SNI earthquake map 2010 and SNI earthquake map 2017 is on the parameters of the acceleration of spectrum response of the earthquake of SNI 2010 (Ss = 1.28), (S1 = 0.46), (Sa = 0.85) lower than the acceleration of the response of the earthquake spectrum in SNI 2017 (Ss = 1.7), (S1 = 0.65), (Sa = 1.13). From these results it can be concluded that there was an increase from the 2010 Earthquake Map with the 2017 Earthquake Map, for Ss there was an increase of 24%. For S1 there was an increase of 29% and for the peak acceleration of Sa there was an increase of 24%. Then from the analysis of the portal structure of the plates, beams and columns, it is known that there are different internal forces. These differences occur because the earthquake load generated on each earthquake map is different. In determining the spectral response of earthquake ground acceleration refer to rock acceleration parameters, the amplication factor is related to short period (Fa) vibrations in the period of 0.2 seconds and 1 second period so that the force in the portal plates, beams and columns produced has increased average shear force (BMD) 2.0728% and moments (BMD) 0.5857% on Plates and an increase in shear force (SFD) 1.7437% and moments (BMD) 4.34% on beams and an increase in shear force (SFD) ) 15.1061% and moment (BMD) 26.44% in the column. Keywords: Campus Building, Earthquake Map, Response Spectrum, SNI 2010, SNI 2017

Item Type: Thesis (Skripsi, Tugas Akhir or Kerja Praktek) (Tugas Akhir)
Subjects: T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi > S1 Teknik Sipil
Depositing User: Kaprodi S1 Teknik Sipil UTY
Date Deposited: 15 Oct 2020 01:29
Last Modified: 15 Oct 2020 01:29
URI: http://eprints.uty.ac.id/id/eprint/5878

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item